Brann v. Campbell
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Franklin, C.
Campbell and wife sued Brann and wife in an action of slander. The defendants answered by averring the truth,of the words charged, in justification. The plaintiffs replied by a denial. There was a trial by a jury, and a verdict for the plaintiffs. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs.
The defendants appealed to this court, and have assigned a large number of errors, among -which is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which states various reasons therefor, which have also been improperly assigned as specifications of error; but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Presser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pruitt v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Fitzgerald v. GoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. McClishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Leinberger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.