Legal Opinion

Jones C. Allred v. C.C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1967No. 11573_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question presented in this habeas corpus proceeding is whether appellee, Allred, properly asserted his right to the assistance of counsel in seeking and prosecuting an appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals from a state court conviction on a rape charge. If he did, his right to the assistance of counsel for purposes of appeal was abridged in violation of the Constitution of the United States. See Douglas v. People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963). The court below reached the conclusion that Allred as serted this right but we find…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Joseph E. Magee v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Russell Judas Nelson v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. William C. Shiflett v. Commonwealth of Virginia, and C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, John Henry Love v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Orrillion D. James v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  3. St. Clair v. CoxDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
  4. Shiflett v. VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. John Henry Redmon v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API