Legal Opinion

Polanco v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1938No. 19526Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Hawkins, Judge.

We have again examined the bill of exception relating to complaint that the jury discussed the failure of appellant to testify. Nine jurors testified that no reference to or discussion of such fact occurred. If we construe their evidence to mean only that they heard -no such reference it would leave only three jurors who might have heard it. The evidence of the foreman was to the effect that some one mentioned it and he immediately stopped any further talk about it. It seems plain that any such reference was casual only. See Freeman v. State, 118 Texas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Heidingsfelder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Lilly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API