Jones v. Gould Steamships & Industrials, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The facts, as the evidence taken in the District Court disclosed them, were clearly and sufficiently stated in the opinion in which Judge Soper gave his reasons for dismissing the libel. 300 F. 109. We agree that, upon the record before him, the libelant was not entitled to a decree. In this court the latter has offered'additional testimony in the form of a circular issued by the Board of Trade of Great Britain in May, 1920, and still in force at the time he met with his injury. It or the copy submitted in evidence, bears on the front, the statement “For Official Use…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. Gould Steamship & Industrials, Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. Steamship ZeelandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Robert Morales v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Elzey v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- McMahan v. the PanamolgaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- The S. S. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.