Miller v. Anheuser
Missouri Court of Appeals
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: New York <& Harlem E. E. Co. v. Mayor of New York, 1 Hilt. 562; Mutham v. Sharp, 15 Barb. 193Fay et al. v. Mayor of Boston, 15 Pick. 243; Young n. City of St. Louis, 47 Mo. 492; McCormick v. Pátchin, 53 Mo. 33; Giboney?;. City .of Cape Girardeau, 58 Mo. 141.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This is an action to subject certain property in the city of :St. Louis to the lien of special tax bills, issued by the city of St. Louis, for the construction of a sewer, nnder authority of ordinances 8002 and 8060.
• There are three counts in the petition, upon as many tax bills.
The answer admits that defendant owns and is in possession of the property sought to be charged, and denies all other material allegations of the petition, and then sets up .as affirmative matter of defense that, by the charter of the city, of March 4, 1870, it is provided (art. 8, sec. 12) that the City Council…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Giboney v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- New York & Harlem Railroad v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858
- City ex rel. Lancaster v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. DuerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Pauls Valley Nat. Bank v. FossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Lansdown v. KiernsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- City of Springfield ex rel. Bank of Commerce v. BaxterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Sheehan v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.