Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1ConcurrenceGoodrich, Circuit Judge
This concurrence represents no disagreement with what Judge Hastie has said but since the statutory language we are concerned with is new and the problem is of some importance, it is thought that the presentation of another point of view on the same question may be helpful.
Since there is diversity of citizenship between Mayflower and Thor but not between Mayflower and Teldisco, our problem under Section 1441(c) of the Revised Title 28 is to determine whether there is pleaded against Thor a cause of action which is “separate and independent” from *540that which is pleaded against Teldisco. While…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bentley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- McAllister v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transp. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Monogram Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1949
- Board of Directors v. WhitesideDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.