Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Medlin v. Vanderbilt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 1925Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy

(concurring) : A further statement of the facts is unnecessary. The exceptions, six in number, allege error, in substance: (l)'In holding that there was no tender of the amount paid for the release, and in refusing to grant a nonsuit for that reason; (2) because his Honor refused to charge the jury on the question of the assumption of risk, under the plea of contributory negligence; (3) that his Honor erred in not directing a verdict (a) upon the defendant’s plea of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff; and (b) in not holding that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. J.B. Colt Company v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Strait v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Betchman v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Becker v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API