Legal Opinion

Buschmeyer v. Advance Machinery Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Lucas county.

1Opinion of the CourtChittenden, J.

This action was brought in the common pleas court and was based upon the rescission of a contract involving the purchase of sixty shares of the capital stock of the defendant company. The prayer was for the recovery of the amount paid for such stock. There was included in this action a claim for some unpaid salary and an amount claimed to be due for salary, represent*203ing the difference between the amount that had been paid to the plaintiff under the terms of his employment, and what he'alleges to be the reasonable value of such services. This latter feature of the action is not of great…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Silver v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway v. Denver and Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cantor v. CantorMontgomery County Probate Court · 1959
  2. Caldwell v. United Presbyterian ChurchAshtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1961
  3. Luthy & Co. v. KlineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. United States Construction Corp. v. Harbor Bay Estates, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Charles P. Leblanc v. Two-R Drilling Company, Third-Party v. Gulf Coast Casing Crews, Inc., Third-Party Highlands Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API