Legal Opinion

Wakeman v. Uber Technologies, Inc

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 28, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02092Unknown

1Opinion

In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ Case No. 23-cv-02092-TC-TJJ _____________ JULIE WAKEMAN, Plaintiff v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., Defendants _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Julie Wakeman sued Sara Singh, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., and Uber USA LLC for personal injury arising out of a car acci- dent. Doc. 1-1. The corporate defendants moved to compel arbitra- tion. Docs. 11 and 17. For the following reasons, those motions are granted, and the case is stayed, pending the outcome of arbitration. I A The Federal Arbitration Act, 9…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API