Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Rutledge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1995No. S95A1149PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

After he was indicted for several offenses, Rutledge pled guilty and received partially probated sentences. When Rutledge was charged with a subsequent offense, a proceeding to revoke his probation was initiated. Rutledge neither employed counsel nor requested the appointment of counsel, and his probation was revoked after a hearing wherein he represented himself. Rutledge thereafter filed a petition for habeas corpus relief against Warden Vaughn. The habeas court granted the petition, finding that the trial court’s failure to in form Rutledge “of his right to appointed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Foskey v. SappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Kemp v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Law v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Kitchens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Meadows v. SettlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Miller v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API