Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Tolosky

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 21, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Irving A. Green, J.

Objections have been filed to the settlement of the intermediate account of the executor as follows:

1. That the value of 53.3 acres of land shown in Schedule F is inflated.

2. That the computation of commissions shown in Schedule I are excessive by reason of the foregoing inflated value placed upon said 53.3 acres of land.

The court has received from respective counsel memoranda on behalf of the petitioner and objectant which address only obliquely the objections, as filed.

The petitioner’s memorandum recites at point I: "The executrix’s commissions should…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of RossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1900
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the Bank of JamestownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of ObergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of SheinmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of StaudNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API