Legal Opinion

Libertarian Party of New Hampshire v. Gardner

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 2, 2016No. 15-2068PPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

Like most states, the State of New Hampshire has long required that political parties seeking to have their nominees listed on statewide election ballots first demonstrate a sufficient modicum of support among registered voters. New Hampshire law deems that a party has made such a demonstration if, in the most recent prior statewide election, one of its candidates received at least four percent of the statewide vote for Governor or United States Senator. N.H. Rev. Stat, Ann, § 652:11. Otherwise a party need submit nomination papers signed by a number of registered…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Martin v. KempDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  2. Saucedo v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
  3. F.E.R.C. v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  4. Indiana Green Party v. Diego MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. Libertarian Party of New Hampshire, et al. v. Christopher T. Sununu, Governor of the State of New Hampshire, in his official capacity, and William M. Gardner, Secretary of State of the State of New Hampshire, in his official capacity.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API