Perry Motors v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
While the petition may be vulnerable to special demurrer in some particulars, it does, in a large way, allege that the plaintiff had a contract with the motor defendants, which had approximately twenty years of remaining life. That while the plaintiff had been selling the products of such companies, it had built up a valuable good will and personnel for the full and satisfactory performance of its business as a dealer in Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth, and De Soto motors. That it had made substantial investments and expenditures. That by reason of the wrongs of said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Raymond v. YarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. BohonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Hooks v. FitzenrieterTexas Supreme Court · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ellis v. PeakDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1938