Legal Opinion

Perry Motors v. Chrysler Corp.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 4853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

While the petition may be vulnerable to special demurrer in some particulars, it does, in a large way, allege that the plaintiff had a contract with the motor defendants, which had approximately twenty years of remaining life. That while the plaintiff had been selling the products of such companies, it had built up a valuable good will and personnel for the full and satisfactory performance of its business as a dealer in Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth, and De Soto motors. That it had made substantial investments and expenditures. That by reason of the wrongs of said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Raymond v. YarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. BohonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Hooks v. FitzenrieterTexas Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. PeakDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API