Legal Opinion

Carrollton Acceptance Co. v. Ruggles Motor Truck Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1931No. Docket No. 71, Calendar No. 35,179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

On the application of plaintiff, a receiver was appointed by the circuit court for the county of Saginaw, in chancery, for the Ruggles Motor Truck Company, defendant. He was authorized to continue the business as a going concern, employ labor, purchase material in the usual course of trade, and do all things necessary to manufacture motor trucks. The receiver from time to time gave orders to Perfex Corporation and Detroit Steel Products Company, claimants and appellants. The nature of the claims and the defenses to them are so similar that they may be treated as one, except as otherwise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. John Brothers Co. v. FalksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Baird v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harper Building Co. v. KaplanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Giannetti v. CornillieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Giannetti v. CornillieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API