Rosenberg v. Bakerman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Based upon appellees’ failure to name and serve the titleholder of the subject property in their mortgage foreclosure action, we reverse. Hubbard v. Highland Realty & Investment Co., 115 Fla. 834, 156 So. 322 (1934); Community Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Wright, 452 So.2d 638 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Davanzo v. Resolute Insurance Co., 346 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Chapman v. L & N Grove, Inc., 265 So.2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davanzo v. Resolute Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Chapman v. L & N Grove, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Hubbard v. Highland Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chattel Ship. & Inv. v. Brickell Place Condo.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985