Warner v. Warner
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
— This appeal is before us on the appellees’ motion to dismiss or affirm. The essence of the motion is that the appellant has failed to cite any authorities in support of his contentions of error. Therefore, under Supreme Court Rule 2-17 (e), (f), the appellees contend the appellant has waived all asserted errors and the judgment should be affirmed.
In reviewing the argument portion of appellant’s brief, we find no citations of authority in support of his arguments. We do not mean merely that the authorities cited do not support his contentions, but rather the brief is absolutely void of any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Chadwick v. BaughmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- King v. Twin City State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stech v. StechIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968