Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Treseler

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 2008No. 59092-8-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

f 1 Documents that are filed with a court are presumptively open to public access unless there are compelling reasons for sealing or redacting them.1 Such reasons may be found by the proponent of closure satisfying *281the standards set forth in Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa.2 Because Michael Treadwell fails in his burden to show that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to seal or redact the documents at issue in this case, we affirm.

¶2 In May 2004, Claudia Treseler petitioned in Washington for dissolution of her marriage to Michael Treadwell. Later that month, she amended her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. IshikawaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Federated Publications, Inc. v. KurtzWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Rufer v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WaldonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. WaldonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Bennett v. Smith Bunday Berman Britton, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Doyle v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Indigo Real Estate Services v. RouseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API