Legal Opinion

Best & Co. v. Incorporated Village of Garden City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring that plaintiffs may lawfully use a vacant plot adjoining the premises of plaintiff Best & Co., Inc., for the free parking of its automobiles and those of its customers, and enjoining defendants from interfering therewith. Section 901 of the Village Ordinances requires that public parking places, except when under or controlled by the village, shall not be conducted unless approved by the board of zoning appeals. Plaintiff Best & Co., Inc., wishes to conduct a parking space, seventy by ninety-five feet, adjacent to important streets and alongside of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Premium Point Park Ass'n v. Polar Bar, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. James v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1949
  4. Boardwalk & Seashore Corp. v. MurdockNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lombardi v. HabichtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API