Legal Opinion
Mi Ja Lee v. Glicksman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated February 17, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to renew *670and/or reargue the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), which was granted by prior order of the same court dated August 21, 2003, and, upon renewal and reargument, denied the motion.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Loland v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Daniel Perla Associates v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hamlet at Willow Creek Development Co. v. Northeast Land Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matheus v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lawman v. Gap, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re SwingearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Derby v. BitanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.