Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCoy, Guardian v. Hydrick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1928No. 12357Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I do not concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Blease, and will respectfully state the grounds of my dissent.

The bald facts stand out in this case, that the.plaintiff, a widow, as guardian of her three small children, who had inherited quite a sum of money from their father, committed to the defendant as an attorney, for investment, certain funds of the guardianship estate, and that the net result of the transactions negotiated for her by Mr. Hydrick is a loss of nearly $14,000, possibly reducible by the disposition of certain mortgaged real estate which she was forced to take…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Whitehurst v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Whitehurst v. . PadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Peele v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Stockgrowers' BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API