Legal Opinion

New Britain National Bank v. Baugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered October 24, 1968, reversed on the law, and partial summary judgment granted in favor of plaintiff against both defendants for the unpaid balance due on the note and according to its original tenor, with costs; iand further, judgment over in favor of the defendant Horgan against the defendant Baugh is similarly granted. This latter relief is accorded, although not requested, in order to avoid needless circuity of actions. The claim for counsel fees is severed and remanded to Special Term for an assessment of damages only. (Bank of New York v. Clavier Corp., 29 A D 2d 927.) The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bank of Ripley v. SadlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Thomas v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Gazza v. United California Bank InternationalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Davis Auction House, Inc. v. Ontario National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. In re the Estate of PickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API