Legal Opinion
Iuteri v. Nardoza
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 4, 1984No. 767, Docket 83-2120PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Iuteri appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Eginton, Judge, entered April 8, 1983, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Iuteri v. Nardoza, 560 F.Supp. 745 (D.Conn.1983).
He argues that his habeas corpus petition should have been granted because (1) the parole retardation procedure employed by the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 2.28(f) denied his constitutional right to due process, (2) the information upon which the Commission relied to reopen…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Lupo v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Willis E. Campbell v. United States Parole Commission and Joseph S. Petrovsky. Appeal of United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Jerry Kenneth Stroud v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Erasmo Gambino v. E.W. Morris (Warden-Fci Fairton) United States Parole CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Steven Guerra v. Edwin Meese, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Vincent Lynch v. United States Parole Commission and Michael Quinlan, Warden, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- LoFranco v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Iuteri v. NardozaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.