Legal Opinion

Wiper Hut Systems, Inc. v. Steavens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 3, 1993No. 93-2627PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners, defendants below, seek certio-rari review of a trial court’s order denying a portion of their motion to tax costs and their motion to assess attorney’s fees against re-spondeni/plaintiff, after plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of this lawsuit. Certiorari is the proper method to review this order. Rose Printing Co., Inc. v. Wilson, 602 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), aff'd, 624 So.2d 257 (Fla.1993). We quash the order and remand with directions that the trial court award the costs relating to the deposition of the plaintiff and award attorney’s fees, which are recoverable under these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ROSE PRINTING COMPANY INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Rose Printing Co., Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sholkoff v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Edwards v. WillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API