Legal Opinion

Hall v. Roulston

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 19, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Garland Circuit Court. Alexander M. Dueeie, Judge. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. It was brought here first by appellee, and was reversed and remanded. Roulston v. Hall, 66 Ark. 305. The action was originally brought by appellee for partition, and was afterwards converted into a suit of ejectment.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Garland Circuit Court. Alexander M. Dueeie, Judge. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. It was brought here first by appellee, and was reversed and remanded. Roulston v. Hall, 66 Ark. 305. The action was originally brought by appellee for partition, and was afterwards converted into a suit of ejectment. Appellee, who is the plaintiff in the action, seeks to recover by his complaint an undivided half of a lot of land in the city of Hot Springs, 75 by 100 feet in size, basing his claim upon a deed from one Ben Hall executed on the 9th day of June, 1893.…

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

To maintain an action on a judgment, a certified 'Cop3r of the judgment alone is not sufficient, but all the pleadings and proceedings on which the judgment is founded, and to which as matter of record it necessarily refers, must be produced. Hallum v. Dickinson, 47 Ark. 120. Each state of the American Union must give the same effect within its limits to the judicial decrees of every other state, which such decrees have in the state where they are rendered. Const. U. S., art. 4, § 1. The record or proceedings of the Tennessee court in the cause was the proper transcript to present to enable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hallum v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. William P. McLaren & Co. v. KehlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  3. Beyer v. TannerIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newton v. RussianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Binion v. LyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Montgomery v. DaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Hoskins v. Fayetteville Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API