Legal Opinion
In re Mellman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1956No. Crim. No. 5563Published
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Habeas corpus. A writ was heretofore issued, return filed and hearing has been had at which it was stipulated that the petition should be considered as a traverse to the return.
Petitioner Murray Mellman was imprisoned by virtue of a judgment and commitment for contempt issued by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The procéeding in the superior court was initiated by affidavits from which it appeared that on November 1, 1950, in an action of Sunbeam Corp. v. Mart, also known as Masters Mart, Inc., the defendant corporation, its officers, directors, agents and employees, were restrained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seagram-Distillers Corporation v. New Cut Rate Liquors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- General Electric Company v. Home Utilities CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Lionel Corp. v. KleinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
- Home Utilities Company, Incorporated, a Body Corporate v. General Electric Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- General Electric Co. v. Automobile Ass'n of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955