Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Coleman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 23, 1984Published

1Dissent

*811Nolan, J.

(dissenting, with whom Lynch, J., joins). I dissent. The court today has held that a trial judge may not consider perjury committed by a defendant, who has elected to take the witness stand, as a factor in his sentencing. The result is disturbing. Every jurisdiction which has considered the issue (there are twelve) holds to the contrary, i.e., a trial judge may consider a defendant’s perjury, among other things, as a factor in assessing his character and disposition for rehabilitation.1

The court asserts that the judge should not have considered the perjury of the defendant “without…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. MeeksIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API