Commonwealth v. Coleman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Dissent
*811Nolan, J.
(dissenting, with whom Lynch, J., joins). I dissent. The court today has held that a trial judge may not consider perjury committed by a defendant, who has elected to take the witness stand, as a factor in his sentencing. The result is disturbing. Every jurisdiction which has considered the issue (there are twelve) holds to the contrary, i.e., a trial judge may consider a defendant’s perjury, among other things, as a factor in assessing his character and disposition for rehabilitation.1
The court asserts that the judge should not have considered the perjury of the defendant “without…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. MeeksIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.