City of Cleveland v. Jurco, 88702 (8-23-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} After pleading no contest to a fourth-degree misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct in Cleveland Municipal Court, defendant-appellant Patrick Jurco appeals from the sentence imposed.
{¶ 2} Jurco presents five assignments of error. He argues his sentence is improper because the trial court: 1) considered conduct that related to the original charge rather than the one to which he entered his plea; 2) neither permitted him to proffer "mitigation" evidence nor considered that evidence; 3) imposed a longer sentence than the one it first pronounced; and, 4) imposed a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Maple Heights v. DickardOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cleveland v. MeehanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cleveland v. Go Invest Wisely, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Strongsville v. JaegerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013