Legal Opinion

Adams v. Dept. of Highways of Mont.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1988No. 87-148PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

This is an appeal from the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County. Summary judgment was granted defendants/respondents Missoula County (County) and the State of Montana (State) on an inverse condemnation claim brought by landowners who lived close to Reserve Street in Missoula, Montana. The landowners, Ivan and Geraldine Adams and a number of other property owners (Landowners), appeal.

We affirm.

The issues are as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment to the County because the County could not be found liable as a matter of law in inverse condemnation for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aeronautical Communications Equipment, Inc. v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Reymond v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bateson v. GeisseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Bateson v. GeisseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Knight v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatory of A.M.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Deschner v. State, Department of HighwaysMontana Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API