Legal Opinion

Washington Market Co. v. Clagett

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 5, 1901No. 1110PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Hearing on an appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the plaintiffs in an action by husband and wife to recover damages for personal injuries to the wife. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alvey

This was an action instituted by the appellees, Mrs. Emma L. Clagett and Maurice J. Clagett, her husband, against the appellants, the Washington Market Company and Frederick L. Grünewald, surviving partner of the late firm of W. M. Moreland & Company, to recover for personal injuries sustained by the female plaintiff, occasioned, as • it is alleged, by the joint neglect of the defendants, while the plaintiff was attending a market, on December 2d, 1898.

It is alleged, and shown in proof by admission, that the Washington Market Company, at the time of the occurrence of the injury complained of,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lottie R. Seganish and Daniel Seganish v. District of Columbia Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Sandoe v. Lefta AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Brodsky v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  5. Association of Western Railways v. Riss & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API