Legal Opinion
United States v. Virgil Lee Baker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1990No. 89-50170PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
This sentencing appeal follows defendant-appellant Virgil Lee Baker’s plea of guilty to charges of conspiracy to use a counterfeit credit card and use of a counterfeit credit card in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(1) and 371.
At the sentencing hearing, Baker challenged the presentence report in which the probation officer recommended an upward adjustment in Baker’s sentence for being the leader of the counterfeiting scheme. The probation officer further recommended that Baker’s sentence be adjusted upward on the ground that Baker obstructed justice by deliberately…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Phillip Ray JeterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Efrain Velasquez-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Frank D. Monaco, United States of America v. Daniel Monaco, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jessie Gonzalez-MaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. John L. St. CyrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Floyd Stevens HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SayetsittyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. George Benitez Javier Ramirez Jose Camilo LizarragaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.