Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C. A. Norgren Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a petition requesting enforcement of an administrative subpoena against the C. A. Norgren Company (Norgren), under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. An order to show cause why the subpoena should not be enforced was issued and Norgren responded, opposing enforcement on a number of grounds. Initially, Norgren claims that the EEOC charge is insufficient to support the subpoena. Norgren also challenges the subpoena on the grounds that it is overbroad, seeks information not relevant to the charge, and is based on an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER COMPANY, INC., Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- United States v. Thomas R. SrokaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 788, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,212 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. K-Mart Corporation and K-Mart Enterprises, Inc., in Re Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982