Legal Opinion

Hall v. Coffin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 18, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Tama District Court. — IIon. Obed Caswell, J udge. ActioN in equity for tbe abatement of an alleged nuisance, and to enjoin tbe defendant from maintaining a place in wbicb to sell or to keep for sale intoxicating liquors in violation of law. There was a bearing on tbe merits, and a decree in favor of tbe defendants for costs. Tbe plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, O. J.

— Tbe petition in this case was filed in April, 1896. It alleges that tbe defendants are registered pharmacists, and that tbe defendant E. M. Ooffin is tbe owner of a lot, wbicb is described, and of a building thereon; that be is tbe owner of certain intoxicating liquors kept for illegal sal.e in the premises; and that tbe defendants established, *467kept, and maintained, padocr to the filing of the petition, and were then keeping and maintaining, a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage, in violation of law. The defendants admit that they are registered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MullenhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Fielding v. La GrangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  2. Mickewicz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API