Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Taylor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 11, 1907PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Toet for personal injuries from falling into an elevator well in a building owned by tbe defendant numbered 52 and 54 on Pearl Street in Boston between nine and ten o’clock in the forenoon of January 8, 1900. Writ dated May 28,1900. At the trial in the Superior Court Bond, J. ordered a verdict for the defendant; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

The plaintiff was route foreman for an ice company, and was assisting one of the drivers of the ice wagons in delivering ice. At 52 Pearl Street on the corner of Wendell Street one Saunders kept a restaurant on the ground floor of the building. His premises were divided by a partition about fifteen feet from the rear, so as to leave a main room in *70front, with tables for guests, and a kitchen in the rear. The main entrance was in front, from Pearl Street, and from Wendell Street a covered passageway led into the building through a thick brick wall to a freight elevator which was used by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Wills v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Garland v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Faxon v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. McCarthy v. Isenberg Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API