In the Interest of: B.R.C.M., A Minor Child v. Florida Department of Children and Families

LAWSON, J.,

specially concurring.

I write separately to acknowledge that Justice Canady and those joining his dissent make some valid observations, with which I do not disagree. However, the dissent also appears to agree that there is an express and direct conflict between the Third District’s decision in In re B.R.C.M., 182 So.3d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), and the First District’s decision in In re Y.V., 160 So.3d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). The dissent further disagrees with portions of the Third District’s analysis; agrees with portions of the First District’s opinion; and appears to agree with…