Grady v. City of Livingston
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE ADAIR:
I dissent. These cases involve the established public policy of this state as formulated by prohibitions of the legislature and by a long line of well-considered decisions of this court. ‘ ‘ The prohibition of the legislature cannot be disregarded by the courts.” (McManus v. Fulton, 85 Mont. 170, 278 Pac. 126, 130, 67 A. L. R. 690.) For more than half a century, has this court consistently followed the doctrine announced by Chief Justice Field in the early California case of Zottman v. San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96, 81 Am. Dec. 96. This constitutes the rule in the federal courts…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.