Legal Opinion
Marsuda-Rodgers International v. The United States, and the Timken Company, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 29, 1990No. 90-1298Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
923 F.2d 871
12 ITRD 2456
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
MARSUDA-RODGERS INTERNATIONAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant/Appellant,
and
The Timken Company, Intervenor-Appellant.
Nos. 90-1298, 90-1316.
United States…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fundicao Tupy S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Fundicao Tupy S.A. And Tupy American Foundry Corporation, Plaintiffs v. The United States, Cast-Iron Pipe Fittings CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Npc, Inc. v. Enviroengineering Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Marsuda-Rodgers International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989