Legal Opinion

Pardee v. Cuyahoga Falls

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1933No. Nos 2331 & 2332PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

These causes are before this court on appeal from the Court of Common Pleas.

The defendant city, under §3871 et seq, GC, attempted to legislate for the construction of district sewers within the municipality, and to assess the cost thereof upon the property benefltted thereby.

*356The plaintiffs brought their actions to enjoin the collection of the assessments.

Three grounds of objection are urged:

1. That no valid sewer district was ever established.

2. Irregularity in the legislative proceedings of council.

3. That the assessments were not made according to benefits resulting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. KelserOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Lichtenwalter v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Pelton v. Board of County Commissioners of Wood Co.Wood County Court of Common Pleas · 1937
  3. Swigart v. BarbertonOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API