Legal Opinion
State v. T.A.K.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 23, 2018No. Case No. 2D17–549Published
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Chief Judge.
The State appeals an order dismissing T.A.K.'s delinquency case due to the expiration of an earlier imposed probationary term. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.145(c)(1)(A). We affirm.
Background Facts
T.A.K. pleaded guilty to the delinquent act of battery. The trial court withheld adjudication of delinquency and placed T.A.K. on six months' probation. The probationary term was to end on October 28, 2016. On September 15, 2016, the State filed an unsworn "Notice of violation of court order," stating that T.A.K. had failed to comply with his probationary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- MacHules v. Department of Admin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Fl. Dept. of Rev. v. FL. MUN. POWER AGENCYSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- State v. SpratlingSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Burton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.