Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Frank Sheridan Jonas & Son
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Defendants move for a summary judgment on the grounds “that the plaintiff' has not the legal capacity to prosecute this-action” and that “the complaint fails to-*669state a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff.” The action was commenced by the filing of the complaint with the Clerk of the Court on May 23, 1946. It alleges: Jurisdiction in this Court under § 205(c) and (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(c, e), and that M.P.R. No. 136 established maximum prices for sales of machinery by wholesalers and retailers. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Schlenker v. Thorne, Neale & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1949