Legal Opinion

Karlin, Elizabeth v. Foust, C. William

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 30, 1999No. 98-2043, 98-2262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On consideration of the petition for rehearing, all the judges on the panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing. It is, therefore, Ordered that the petition for rehearing is Denied.

A vote was requested on the petition for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Posner, and Circuit Judges Rovner, Diane P. Wood, Evans and Williams voted to grant rehearing en banc; Circuit Judges Coffey, Flaum, Easterbrook, Manion and Kanne voted to deny rehearing en banc. Circuit Judge Ripple took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

The vote for en banc review failed to obtain a majority of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elizabeth Karlin, M.D. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. Gary T. Prohaska, M.D. And Summit Women's Health Organization, on Behalf of Themselves and Their Patients Seeking Abortions v. C. William Foust, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Dane County and a Representative of the Class of All District Attorneys in Wisconsin James E. Doyle, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Wisconsin, and E. Michael McCann in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API