Legal Opinion
Moorman v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 16, 1963No. 40072PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
1. (a) A general assignment of error in the bill of exceptions to the judgment overruling a motion for a new trial is sufficient. Huxford v. Southern Pine Co. of Ga., 124 Ga. 181 (1) (52 SE 439).(b) “Where a bill of exceptions which can be identified as excepting to a specific judgment shall be served upon counsel of record in the case, such service shall be held to- bind all parties whom said counsel represented in the trial court.” Code § 6-912. Where two or more attorneys appear as attorneys of record in the case, both signing the answer of the defendant, appearing as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huxford v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Jarrell v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Blackwell v. Southland Butane Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Taylor v. FelderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Cook v. Case Threshing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Reese v. Ideal Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ProudfootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ProudfootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.