Legal Opinion

Town of Tunbridge v. Town of Royalton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 15, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petitions to the Supreme Court of Orange County. The petition was signed. “Town of Chelsea, by its attorney, S. B. Hebard.”

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Taft, J.

These cases are petitions under No. 18 of the Acts of 1884, asking to be relieved from liability to support a bridge in the town of Royalton. The petitionee moves to dismiss the petitions for that they are not properly signed. The petition in each case is signed the name of the petitioning town, “by its attorney, S. B. Hebard.” The act authorizing the proceeding reads, “any town, etc., may petition the court.” It nowhere provides for the signing by any particular officer of the town; and we are not aware of any law making it the duty of any…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Underhill v. Towns of Essex, Jericho & WillistonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
  2. Town of Strafford v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API