Hoerner v. Woods

Plaintiff, appellee herein, moves to dismiss this appeal on questions of law and fact, taken from the Municipal Court of the city of Dayton, claiming that the appeal was not timely and that no appeal bond has been filed.

Plaintiff’s petition and defendant’s cross-petition both seek property damages allegedly arising out of a traffic accident.

Pursuant to motion by the defendant the Municipal Court made separate findings of fact and conclusions of law which were filed on January 17, 1958. Among the conclusions of law appears this language:

“And the court hereby renders judgment in favor of the…