Legal Opinion

Capital Transit Co. v. Grimes

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 24, 1947No. 9327PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia in favor of appellee, plaintiff below, in an action for damages for personal injuries. The trial judge, in his charge to the jury, gave an instruction on the doctrine of last clear chance. Appellant contends this was error.

Only recently we stated that, “The doctrine presupposes a perilous situation created or existing through the negligence of both the plaintiff and the defendant, but assumes that there was a time after such negligence had occurred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dean v. Century Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. UppermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Capital Transit Co. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Landfair v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  3. Griffin v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Sucesión de Ortiz Robles v. RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  5. Helen v. F. Gay v. George M. AugurCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API