Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2005No. 2004-CA-115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gwin, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from the Licking County Municipal Court’s granting of defendant-appellee’s, Delbert Hall’s, motion to suppress. The following facts give rise to this appeal.

{¶ 2} In the early morning of April 16, 2004, Officer Mark Emde of the Heath Police Department was on patrol in the city of Heath. Shortly before midnight, he observed a vehicle driving erratically on State Route 79. The officer saw the vehicle weave within its lane several times and cross the berm and the centerline a few times. As the vehicle approached the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. NutterMarion County Municipal Court · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BoczarOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. Auld, 2006-Cac-120091 (7-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Ladigo, Unpublished Decision (6-27-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. BoczarOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API