Legal Opinion

Birdsboro Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1981No. Appeal, No. 228 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

An employer, Birdsboro Corporation, has appealed from decisions of the referee and Unemployment Compensation Board of Review granting benefits to claimants, four supervisors who, according to the employer, were discharged for willful misconduct and therefore ineligible for benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act).1

The employer company produces steel castings, fabrications and machine products. Certain supervisors in the company had incorporated the Birdsboro Foundry-Fabrication and Production Foreman’s Guild, Local No. 1 (Guild); the four…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Moran v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. National Aluminum Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Miller v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. City of Beaver Falls v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Stickloon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Penflex, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API