Legal Opinion

Paul A. Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital District v. George J. Luibel

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1985No. 83-1638PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

We reaffirm today the settled constitutional rule that state agencies may pursue legitimate purposes by any means having a conceivable rational relationship to those purposes. A decision that passes constitutional muster under the rational-basis test does not violate the equal protection clause simply because it violates a state anti-discrimination statute.

I

Five osteopaths were denied staff privileges by the John Peter Smith Hospital, which is operated by the Tarrant County Hospital District, a Texas state agency, because they had trained in an…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Betty J. Archie v. City of Racine, Ronald W. Chiapete, and George W. GieseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Johnson v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Committee of United States Citizens Living in Nicaragua v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Bryan v. City of Madison MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Woodard v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API