Legal Opinion
New York Central Railroad v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 546 of the Civil Practice Act.
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The controversy between the parties involves two alleged causes of action in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. In the agreed statement of facts, signed by the respective parties, for a first cause of action, it is stipulated as follows:
“ 1. That at all the times hereinafter mentioned plaintiff was and now is a domestic steam railroad corporation and maintains an office for the transaction of business in the Borough of Manhattan, City, County and State of New York.
“ 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 of the Act of Congress, approved August 29, 1916, the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. LindellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Friedman v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. South Carolina Produce Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1928
- Rindge Building v. United Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- New York Central Railroad v. Niagara Fruit Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.