Legal Opinion

Smith v. Watters

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1931No. 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.

Although the promise to pay a commission is not contained in a written contract between the plaintiff and defendant, it is not for that reason an insufficient memorandum under the statute.

Jacobs v The Joseph E. Copp Co., 123 Oh St, 146.

Clark on Contracts, Sec. 50, p. 116.

It is contended, however, that it is not a sufficient memorandum to satisfy the requirements of §8621 GC, because no consideration for the promise is stated in the writing.

There is a considerable conflict of opinion and diversity of holding on the question whether the memorandum of a contract falling within the statute of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Field v. HammMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Owens v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Edwards v. PetrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Herman v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Herman v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API