Smith v. Watters
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
Although the promise to pay a commission is not contained in a written contract between the plaintiff and defendant, it is not for that reason an insufficient memorandum under the statute.
Jacobs v The Joseph E. Copp Co., 123 Oh St, 146.
Clark on Contracts, Sec. 50, p. 116.
It is contended, however, that it is not a sufficient memorandum to satisfy the requirements of §8621 GC, because no consideration for the promise is stated in the writing.
There is a considerable conflict of opinion and diversity of holding on the question whether the memorandum of a contract falling within the statute of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Field v. HammMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Owens v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Edwards v. PetrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Herman v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Herman v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965