Kane Associates v. Blumenson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
The general rule governing the rights to collect rents as between the owner of realty and a receiver appointed in foreclosure proceedings is well understood and not in dispute. But its application in the particular factual situation presented has not, as far as research discloses, ever been submitted to a court.
It appears that prior to the foreclosure proceedings, there were two actions pending between the landlord and the tenants of the building. The first was a summary proceeding based on nonpayment of rent. The second was a proceeding by the tenants for the appointment of an administrator…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. Fulton Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Harris v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Wyckoff v. . ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Rider v. . BagleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Wiggins v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Genuth v. First Division Avenue Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. Brown & East Ridge PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Enak Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. 7 Bros. Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ronbarst Realty Corp. v. Boardwalk Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.